The people reserve to themselves the power to propose laws and amendments to the constitution and to enact or reject the same at the polls independent of the general assembly and also reserve power at their own option to approve or reject at the polls any act or item, section, or part of any act of the general assembly.
The Colorado constitution was amended in 1910 to add the initiative process, which lets citizens sponsor proposed new state laws or proposed amendments to the state constitution, and submit them to a vote of the public.
As of 1995, initiatives have been limited to single subjects. See Article V, section 1(5.5). The Title Board is charged with making the initial determination that an initiative concerns a single subject and, if it does, setting a ballot title that is fair and not misleading. The decision of the Title Board can be appealed to the Colorado Supreme Court. Sometimes the proponents appeal, but more often an objector appeals. You can view initiatives that have been challenged in the Colorado Supreme Court since 2006 with the links on the left-hand side of this page.
Historic initiative issues in Colorado have included:
Ballot title appeal briefing schedule for 2025
Petition filed on or before March 21, 2025: 20 days simultaneous opening briefs/20 days simultaneous answer briefs
Petition filed on or before April 11, 2025: 14 days simultaneous opening briefs/14 days simultaneous answer briefs
Petition filed April 12, 2025 or later (November ballot): 7 days simultaneous opening briefs/7 days simultaneous answer briefs
Chronological listing of Colorado initiatives and referenda, 1912 - Present, Colorado Legislative Council: http://www.leg.state.co.us/lcs/ballothistory.nsf/
Anyone who is dissatisfied with the Title Board's action at a rehearing may file an appeal with the Colorado Supreme Court. The Court is required to act on the appeal promptly when an appeal is filed within five days of receiving the required documentation from the Secretary of State. The Court can either affirm the action of the Title Board or reverse it, in which case the Court must remand the case to the Title Board with instructions, pointing out where the Title Board is in error.